Monthly Archives: August 2008

Lightroom 2 fixes uneven stage lighting

I just finished processing last night’s Stone Mountain LIVE show (a rather eclectic tribute to the music of the 1950′s).

The Stone Mountain Arts Center is renown for its live music and sound system (as it should be) — less so for the stage lighting.   When you have a large group playing, and they often do, the performers off of center stage drop into the shadows (easily a one-stop drop).

While editing the photographs I realized that Lightroom 2′s new graduated neutral density (GND) filter tool might easily tune the wider-angle stage shots and bring it closer to what an audience member would see.   Now, doing this kind of exposure adjustment was always possible in Photoshop, but I don’t have the time to go through that process for what could be dozens of photos.   With Lightroom I set up a half-stop increase in the exposure and set it at an angle — almost as if I was adding a light to the stage.  The result created a much nicer balance (see the sample image below).  And I could sync this adjustment to the photos that needed it, fine tuning the position of the filter for the composition of each shot.

I’ve done some other work with the LR2 local adjustments, diddling with the masking tool, and I’ve found some uses for that — but for my workflow I think the graduated neutral density filter adjustment tool will turn more bland photos into selects than any other new toy in Lightroom.  Between this new tool and the improved sharpening, it is well worth the cost of upgrade.

Sample: The “stage left” lighting leave sax players Paul Ahlstrand and Tom Hall in the dark.  A somewhat narrow GND filter centered just over drummer Billy MacGillivray’s head makes it appear a new stage light was added.

20088-491-1957.jpg

20088-491-1957-nd.jpg

View full post »

Was this what it was like?

20088-385-5403.jpg

In 1852, Henry David Thoreau wrote in his journal about some walks he made up the Assabet River in Concord ( and he wrote about the sandy bottom of the river, the clear water, and the ability to see every detail of the bottom.  He also wrote of the weeds that grew on the bottom that remind you of the sea.

This past Sunday I had the opportunity to, perhaps, visit a place that recalls the river that was.   We paddled a section of the Swift  River in central Massachusetts.   The Swift River has the rather unique distinction of being the primary source of water for Boston — the river was dammed in the 1930′s to form the massive Quabbin Reservoir.  But the fine folks of Boston don’t manage to drink all of the water and so a little bit is allow to continue down the river and it’s just a great place to visit.

I really was in awe paddling on this water.  Whether the water was two or twelve feet deep, I could see quite clearly to the bottom.  Instead of the more typical dark, almost brown, plantlife I see in other rivers, this part of the Swift was dotted with verdant green gardens of various water plants — all teeming with fish.

To realize that, at one time, the river in my backyard shared similar qualities was really a mind-opener.  As an advocate for our river I’m constantly trying to find ways of connecting people to it — particularly through my photography.  I lacked the ability to capture what I experienced on the Swift River that afternoon, but I’m going to go back one day soon and try — because I think it represents what we’ve lost and what we might be able to give back to our grandchildren (actually, that might be aggressive — we’ve got about 100 years of use and abuse to try to reverse).

It has been gone for so long, I don’t think people realize what we’ve lost (and what we have to gain by coming to terms with what we’ve done to the river).  This isn’t the image that will tell that story, but there’s a picture that will and I’m going to go and find it.

View full post »

Camping at DAR

20088-385-5383.jpg

We spent the weekend at DAR State Forest out in western Massachusetts – mostly kayaking at different spots.  I did take a few photos at the campsite.  This one is obviously processed a bit, but I think matches the feeling of the mixture of light and campfire smoke more than the original image does.

View full post »

F a c e b o o k
C o n n e c t