David Griffin Photography

Images, videos, tips and news from David Griffin Photography

Category Archives: Events

Click on the title of the blog post to view the entire entry.


Shooting in the Dark – River Solstice

For the past eight years or so we’ve had this fun little event on our local rivers, River Solstice, that celebrates the longest day of the year.  We’ve had our share of washouts, but most of the time Mother Nature cooperates.  The location and the nature of the event make this a definite challenge to capture photographically.  After a nice picnic on the lawn of the Old Manse (where the music performers typically have the sun setting almost directly behind them) a large number of paddlers descend on the Concord River at sunset to begin a flotilla of boats, most with lanterns, up to the Old Calf Pasture where a bonfire and drumming occurs.  My goal was to photograph the paddlers making their way up the river.

So let’s be clear about the challenge:  1) subjects are gliding by on the river, 2) I’m in a kayak on the same river, 3) the sun has set and it is rapidly getting quite dark.  Perfect! Let’s make some portraits!

The full set of images is available on my community gallery.  In there you will see the progression of the evening’s light disappearing and I was left to find whatever candle or other light was nearby.  There was a near full moon rising, but it really didn’t have much of an impact when I was shooting.

Here’s the link to the evening’s pictures: [url]http://community.dmg-photography.com/2010-river-solstice[/url]

What follows are a few highlights of the evening plus some technical details for those that are interested.  I encourage you to look at the full gallery mostly because it clearly shows that the current generation of DSLR cameras are capable of some pretty amazing photographs in some relatively challenging conditions.

The evening starts with a picnic and music on the lawn of The Old Manse in Concord which overlooks the Old North Bridge.  I tried to have some fun with the strong back and rim lighting the setting sun provided.

The kayak and canoe “parking lot” was pretty full…

Some folks were watching the moon rise in style…

The sun has set, the singers are making their way along the river to the Old Calf Pasture for some pagan fun, and the flotilla of boats begins working its way up the Concord River…

My friend Julia Blatt, who heads the Massachusetts Rivers Alliance, was paddling with her hubby…

Night quickly overtakes the river…   I think a number of people were kind of shocked that I was taking photographs — and probably assumed that everything I was doing would be a blurry mess.  (I knew otherwise…)

Here we are at the Old Calf Pasture where a bonfire is ringed with torches.  The sound of ceremonial drums pierces the darkness.   (And drowns out the sound of mosquitos, which are pummeling everyone — or at least me…)   For reasons that I won’t go into here, I don’t hop on land and photograph the fire circle despite it being an obvious target of opportunity for great images…


Technical notes:

All photographs were shot with a Canon 7D.   Nearly all were taken with the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, although there are a handful (which I hope are obvious) that were taken with the 24-70mm f/2.8L.  All shots are handheld, all but the picnic shots are from a kayak.  Due to the rapidly changing light I opted for aperture priority exposure.  (If you need me to tell you what aperture I was using most of the evening you probably shouldn’t bother reading the rest of this…)

As the sun sets the camera is set to ISO 1250, then 2500.   If you aren’t familiar with shooting on a small New England river, you should be aware that it is similar to being in a hole.   The shoreline is typically lined with trees and long before the sun sets you are in shadow.  A few minutes after it sets, it just gets plain dark – especially if there are no clouds to reflect light straight down.   So it was a matter of a minute or two before I cranked the camera to ISO 6400.

Exposures vary from 1/100 (if there’s a bright lantern) to 1/20th of a second.   Image stabilization and years of practice shooting from a kayak kept my throw-aways amazingly low.   And a quick shout out to the 7D’s autofocus!  I used center-point focus because I know that is typically the most sensitive part of the AF array.  Half the time I was hunting for a subject in the viewfinder.  If the camera found anything at all, it did a great job of holding focus while I did the final composition and shooting. (This is the primary reason why I didn’t bring the 5DMk2 to this project — it’s low-light AF is, um, “sub par”…)

In the case of these photographs however, the camera only did half the work.   A significant portion of the image quality comes from Lightroom 3′s new image processing and noise reduction capabilities.   As I cranked up the ISO on the camera in the field, I had a commensurate increase in the luminance noise reduction in Lightroom.  Quite frankly, tack sharp images were not my goal.  Moving subjects in a dimly lit area don’t feel sharp to our eyes, so I didn’t feel any need to try to bring any particular sharpness out — the default sharpening of Lightroom fit the bill most of the time.   Most of the night images had the Luminance noise set to 45.  A few, including the young lady at the beginning of this article, were bumped to 64.   I knew from reports and the beta testing that the noise reduction was going to be impressive, and it served me well for this assignment.

The processing of these images varies significantly depending on the lighting conditions.  The look for the photographs taken after the sun set was achieved by adding fill light and then raising the black point to restore some contrast.   I really didn’t want to raise the exposure of the whole image as the scene was, in reality, quite dark — but rather mimic what the human eye does by selectively increasing the luminance of the subjects.   A bit of vibrance and a dash of clarity round out the Lightroom processing.

There you have it, a new branch of photography: action portraits in the dark.

Stone Mountain Arts Center Lobby Barn Raising

On a beautiful Memorial Day weekend a team of timber-framers and neighbors came together to raise a 200-year-old barn once again.

In 2005 the barn’s much younger sister was literally flown over it to a new foundation where it became the Stone Mountain Arts Center performance space.  The older barn was disassembled and stored in a nearby field, quietly waiting for its chance to serve again.

Restored by Scott Campbell (Maine Mountain Post & Beam) the structure was raised on its new foundation just a few feet from its original location.  The barn will now serve as a lobby and reception area for the Arts Center.

I was there to document the raising of the barn, a 10 hour process involving many hands, backs, and one hydraulic crane.  It was humbling to know that a couple of centuries ago a similar event took place with most of the same timbers.  I reckon it may have taken more people and more time (and probably a horse or two).

A full, annotated, gallery of the event is available on my SMAC photos page: [url]http://smac.dmg-photography.com/SMAC-Lobby-Barn-Raising[/url]

I shot over 500 stills, 200 video clips, 22 minutes of HDV footage, and a 3000-frame time-lapse video.  This is the first of what I suspect will be several “products” related to this event.   I hope to create a couple of short-form documentaries or music videos using the video and stills.   Here’s the first video from the event, a time-lapse of the the raising:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHzVqBAUWiY[/youtube]

Below are a few of my favorite images from the day.  After that I include some technical notes on the filming process (settings and setup).





As a fund-raiser for the barn people could sponsor a peg and have a message written on it.   When the barn is refurbished in another century or two, these messages will be there to read — a time-capsule in plain sight.  These are just a few of the many pegs that carried messages to the future:


The large hammer is called a “beatle” — because it is used to beat a post or beam into place.



When the structure’s is completed a ceremonial “wetting bow” is nailed to the peak:





Technical notes and behind the scenes (including my mistakes):

I had nearly every piece of equipment I own involved in this project:

1) 22 minutes of the initial wall raising was filmed with a Sony HC-7 HDV camcorder that was attached to a signpost using a Jobi Gorillapod and some elastic ties.  By the time the crane arrived the sun was MUCH brighter than when I set the camera up.  So much brighter that I couldn’t see the viewfinder well enough to tell if the film was rolling.  So I just shut it off, turned it back on, pressed the record button and hoped for the best.

Why 22 minutes?  To be honest this camera was just a bit of extra coverage and I was using up what was left on a tape.  I knew this was going to be at least an 8 hour process and I had no intention or reason to film all of it.  I figured the first wall would take less than a half-hour to raise and gambled from there.

2) The time-lapse video was captured with a Canon 10D mounted with a 16-35mm f/2.8L lens at 16mm. The exposure was set manually: 1/80, f/11, ISO 100 and fixed white balance: 5800K.  Because of the length of the capture I elected to shoot in JPEG, medium resolution (2048×1152) as this would give me sufficient resolution for a 1080p video frame but still fit the day on a couple of 4GB cards.  The camera was controlled by a Canon TC-80 intervalometer.

The camera was mounted on a tripod and ballhead which was fixed to the top of a step ladder with gaffers tape.  The step ladder, was set on a reasonably firm surface and ballasted with some spare post pieces that were hanging around.  This provided a reasonably stable platform, although you can see small shifts every once in a while when I ascended the ladder to check on exposure, batteries, etc.    By incredible luck (for me that is) the camera was able to be aimed almost directly north which meant that the sun was always behind the camera, eliminating a chance of lens flare.  Putting a hood on a 16mm lens seems superfluous, but I suppose I should have brought one along.

The camera has a dual battery setup and it performed well considering the age of some of my batteries.   If you look closely you will see that there is a slight skip in the video when be broke for lunch.  I changed out the batteries with another set at that time.

The 10D was not my first choice for this assignment.  It was a backup camera.  I wanted to use my 1D Mark II for the job.  The 1D’s sensor has a 1.3X crop factor versus the 10D’s 1.6x.  The 1D would give me a much larger field of view, and I really wanted it given where the camera had to be placed and the size of barn – especially because I planned on cropping the image down to 16×9 for the video.   Being a careful planner, I had scoped this out and fired some test shots on Sunday afternoon to confirm that this was the better camera to use.  I had also brought along two batteries for the 1D and its charger.  What I didn’t bring is the AC cord for the charger and the Ni-MH batteries don’t hold a charge well for long periods of time — so I had planned on charging them Sunday night.   I discovered the lack of a cord around 7pm — which is precisely when the nearest Home Depot closed on a Sunday.

And that’s why I bring backup cameras…

Because of the narrower field-of-view with the 10D I had to guess how tall the barn would be and try to frame it accordingly while still keeping some of the interesting stuff in the foreground.   If you watch the time-lapse video you’ll see that the peak of the barn JUST fits into the frame and so I elected to do a little downward tilt of the camera, moving it slowly across about 8 or 9 frames.

I had planned the time-lapse to run about 90 seconds covering the 6 hours, so I had set the camera to take an exposure every 15 seconds, mostly to make sure that I kept within the 4GB limit of the CF card I was using.  When the noon-time switch was made I noticed I had used just over 2GB and so I changed the timing to every 10 seconds for the “second half”.  The difference isn’t all that extreme but I think it makes some of the crane movements much more fluid and only extended the run-time a slight amount.

3) Video was shot using the Canon 5D Mark II, 1080p at 30fps.  I used a 3-stop ND filter and a polarizer on the lenses to cut the light down and give a decent depth of field.  I typically shot at 1/50 second, ISO 400, and around f/5.6 — depending on the scene.  The camera was stabilized on a monopod, although occasionally used a tripod coupled with the Zaza Slider.   I used both the 24-70mm f/2.8L and the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS lenses (mostly the latter) for the video work.   Because I was shooting video most of the time (although I shot over 160 stills using the camera) the Zacuto Z-finder made the day a lot nicer.

Audio was not a primary concern for this shoot, but I wanted something cleaner than the camera mic.   I had brought along the JuicedLink and some good mics, but opted to just use a wired lav clipped to my shirt and let the 5D do automatic levels (horrors!).   Again, I was just looking for natural sounds, but not a structured soundtrack.   If I had approached this more as a documentary featuring, say, Scott and wanted to capture dialog I would have used the wireless mics and mixed in natural sound from a shotgun.

4) Stills were captured with the 1D Mark II (until the batteries wore out) and then the Canon 40D.  The still camera got whatever lens the 5D wasn’t using at the time (mostly the 24-70mm).  The camera was set in aperture-priority mode, ISO 320, and around f/5.6.  This gave shutter speeds around 1/1200 to 1/2000 second during the day and would freeze the action well.  This was in marked contrast to the 5D which would have lots of motion blur at 1/50 second because of the video settings.  I could move between the two looks the cameras would give as needed.

5) I had my MacBook Pro set up in the Arts Center ready to process cards at various points during the day.  My little area also had battery chargers going for (almost) all of the cameras.  This worked out well and I was able to show people some morning shots and preliminary bits of the time-lapse by the time lunch was over.   By the time I left for the evening I had all of the stills processed through Lightroom and the video clips (all 23GB worth) were previewed.

Other than my charger debacle, everything worked as I had planned and I’m really happy with the results and look forward to sharing more of them with everyone in the near future.

True West – April 24, 2010

Last night we were filming for an Electronic Press Kit I’m producing with one of our local bands, True West.  I’ll detail the video production in an upcoming post, but I couldn’t help but grab some stills during the performance.  This is a great benefit of the video-capable DSLRs like the Canon 5D Mark II: I was there to shoot video but I could switch to still shooting for certain parts of the performance with relative ease.   These are some of my favorite shots of the evening.  A larger gallery of images can be found at my Events page:

[url]http://events.dmg-photography.com/2010-truewest-watertown[/url]

They had some basic controls over the lighting, and every once in a while they’d turn on a combination that wasn’t hum-drum. The first photo is the band’s lead vocalist, Laura Pratt, shot in profile and underexposed to emphasize the backlight.

I always feel bad for the drummers — they’re almost always stuck in the back.  I managed to catch Tom Greim with some decent light on him.

Jim Pedersen is the bassist and a vocalist for the band.  The stage was dominated by two banks of lights flanking the performers.  This means that the guys on the end have too much light and the main performer in the center has too little.   Shooting into the light creates some nice effects.

That’s John Kelly on the guitar.  He was one of the “end guys” that was getting blasted with the lights, so when they picked a low-light situation I couldn’t pass up the opportunity.

Jim Pedersen again, shot at the same time as the first photo.

Allyn Dorr was the guy at other end, playing guitar and losing vision in his right eye from the lights.  I’m not fond of hats, but if you’re going to wear one it’s nice when it contributes to the image rather than fights it.

Laura belting out another song.

John Kelly on guitar.

And a few more from the evening…





It was a fun night and they had everybody there dancing along — can’t beat that.   I’m looking forward to getting the video into Final Cut and seeing what I can do with it.  My thanks to John, Laura, Jim, Allyn, and Tom for letting me capture a bit of the evening’s fun.

Technical drivel:

All shot with a Canon 5D Mark II, ISO 1600, white balance set at 4000, manual exposure.  Just looking at the pics here, they’re all with the 70-200mm f/2.8L lens.  Because I was shooting video most of the time the camera was on a monopod and the shutter is typically at 1/60, but when I switched to more still shooting that got cranked up a bit (1/100 or so).   Shooting video is why I had the white balance set as well — normally I don’t really care because I set the white balance in Lightroom.

Most of these images were shot using Live View and manual focus.  I had the camera rigged for video shooting and so I was doing all of the composition and focusing using the LCD screen coupled with the Zacuto viewfinder.  Near the end of the night, when I was done with the video work, I switched to the regular viewfinder and auto-focus.

All processed with Lightroom with varying amounts of processing (mostly clarity +20, exposure, levels tweaks, and occasional vignetting).

Stone Mountain LIVE Christmas 2009

Photos from the December 19th, 2009 Stone Mountain LIVE Christmas show. This was one of 5 shows that spanned two weekends and are the final Stone Mountain LIVE shows for 2009.

More photos from the evening can be found at: [url]http://smac.dmg-photography.com/SML-Christmas-2009/[/url]

Special guest performers for this evening were the Burns Sisters, from Ithaca, NY. Marie, Annie, and Jeannie Burns sang a number of holiday tunes – some familiar, some not.

The Stone Mountain Boys were in fine form with a number of powerful instrumental interludes. Here Duke Levine, Kevin Barry, and Richard Gates jam on a holiday song behind a sea of mike stands. (Also performing, but not pictured are Sonny Barbato on piano/accordian and Billy MacGillivray on drums.)

Chris Cote, the Stone Mountain Boy’s vocal powerhouse, belted out some exciting and hilarious holiday tunes.

Carol, Chris, and the Burns Sisters performing “Blue Christmas”

——–

Technical: Canon 40D at ISO 1600 with a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS handheld. Exposures were typically 1/60 to 1/40 second, wide open at f/2.8 — and these were generally underexposed by at least 1/3 stop. Canon 1D Mark 2 at ISO 1600 with a 24-70mm f/2.8L handheld. Exposures centered around 1/60 second, but varied more than the telephoto shots.

2009 WAVM Telethon Favorites

The WAVM Beacon Santa Telethon raised close to (and, by now, probably over) $32,000 for local families in need.  This was a 40-hour live television show produced by high school students.  A difficult task for professionals, they showcase a variety of local talents in conjunction with an auction.

What follows are a few favorite photographs that I took during the telethon.

(Above: Mark Poulin, of HELP!, performs on stage on Friday evening.)


Each year Mr. Vic brings his young music class to sing some holiday songs.


A member of the Maynard Community Band gets into the spirit.


Mark Malcolm, children’s librarian at the Maynard Public Library, hosted a talent show and led the kazoo orchestra.

Connie and Vinnie Stigliani perform as part of the “Tap ‘n’ Tones”.

Violinist Jagan Singh accompanied Liz Pekkala in a Studio A performance of Christmas music.

Members of the famed “Senior Shakers” perform on-stage.

One of Miss Tricia’s dance studio students performing a ballet.

Laura Pratt belts out a tune performing on-stage with True West.

One of our more popular local hip-hop artists, T-Nova, performs on-stage Saturday night.

At 10pm on Saturday the Toy Auction gets underway.

One of the telethon hosts, Nick Jacques, singing in Studio A.

Here’s a good chunk of the team that made that $31,899.10 total possible.  Seven hosts and their tech crews, who work in shifts to keep the 3 television studios and radio station operational during the 40-hour event.

The hosts have a little fun after the telethon winds down. (L-R: Samantha Howell, Jason Schomacker, Emily Witham, Nick Jacques, Rachel MacGillivary, Joey Tyler, Katrina Kohlman).

For way too many other photos of the telethon head over to: [url]http://wavm.org/telethon09/gallery.html[/url]

Veterans Day – Nov 11, 2009
















wpid1374-2009B-263-5405.jpg

For an expanded set of photos from Maynard’s 2009 Veterans Day Parade please visit my community site: [url]http://community.dmg-photography.com[/url]

To all that have served and are serving today, thank you.

Harmony Halloween Horse Show – A Different View

wpid1320-2009A-385-3050.jpg

When I do an event shoot I take a LOT of pictures – (often) hundreds to (occasionally) thousands of them.  When I post galleries I edit them down to to a small fraction of the day’s captures and then I whittle it down to a handful of personal favorites for a blog posting.  My editing process involves several passes of the photographs: the first pass involves deleting bad frames (badly blown or out-of-focus exposures, test shots of the ground) — you know, utter garbage.  And I really delete them.   The subsequent phases involve various forms of rating and have a lot to do with the particular event and why I was there and what kind of story I’m trying to tell with the images.

The bottom line is that a LOT of photos end up on the proverbial cutting room floor.   Wouldn’t it be nice if I could use them all without inducing eye-clawing boredom on the viewer’s part?   Well, here’s my quick attempt at such a thing — let me know what you think.   758 images in 100 seconds…

[vimeo]http://vimeo.com/7483048[/vimeo]

(Also available on YouTube HD)

Technical stuff:

I originally approached this using a new feature of Lightroom 3 (Beta) that allows exporting of slideshows in H.264 video.   This is a really cool feature and I will certainly make use of it for certain projects.  (It is also a slick way to easily produce more traditional time-lapse videos directly from Lightroom.)   As with most things there are tradeoffs and the drawback of this direct-from-Lightroom technique is one of performance and flexibility.  It takes a LONG time for Lightroom to generate the video and when you are done you may find that you wanted a different pacing — and then you’ll end up generating it again.

The bulk of the time was spent tuning the images in Lightroom.  In a normal edit I only spend time fine-tuning the looks of the selected images, but in this case all of them needed some level of processing.   Fortunately I shoot in manual mode so the input exposures are pretty consistent.  This means that I can apply the same corrections to large sets of images at a time using the Synchronize tools in Lightroom.  I even created a few Develop Presets along the way to make this even easier for the shoot.  The emphasis was on creating groups of similarly exposed images so that the video levels wouldn’t be jumping too far out of whack. There are a couple of ways of approaching this, but in my case I created a separate Lightroom catalog with just this shoot in it — so the edits of my selects didn’t affect the edits for the video.   I could have also achieved the same result with a collection of virtual copies and may well do this in the future because it allows me to keep both end-products in the same catalog.

I used the same Slideshow capability in Lightroom, but opted to generate JPEG images instead.   (This output option is plain to see Lightroom 2, but you have to press the Option (Alt on PC’s) key in the new Lightroom 3 interface.)  For this video I selected the output size 1280×720 to match the 720p HD frame size.  Lightroom took almost an hour to generate the 758 frames on my 4-processor MacPro.  From there I open the images as an Image Sequence in Quicktime Pro and  select a frame rate.  10 frames per second happens to be close to the burst rate of my Canon 1DMk2 camera so the jump sequences almost play in “real time” and the pacing for the rest of the images is pleasingly frenetic.   The important part here is that if I didn’t like the frame rate choosing a different one and previewing it takes a few seconds rather than hours.

It is important to note that the use of Lightroom’s Slideshow feature is important to the success of this workflow.  If you chose to simply export the images they would end up being different sizes (unless you used identical cropping on every single one of them) and they also would not be sized for a video frame.   If the generated images are not identical in terms of aspect and resolution they will not be included in the Quicktime image sequence.  Using the Slideshow option allows you to generate consistently sized image frames with whatever background you want to use.

After generating the frames in Lightroom and rendering them as an image sequence with Quicktime Pro, I imported the video file as a clip into Final Cut Pro where I added the titles and credits and then added the soundtrack (thank you Duke!).  Once I had the music there I realized it might be fun to break up the video a bit to correspond to the music.   This is a creative process where you can absolutely go overboard.  Since this video was meant to be just a fun use of “excess” images I tried to keep it simple.  I then added the titles and credits and then uploaded it to the YouTubes…

I did some basic color grading in Final Cut, keeping the images coming out of Lightroom pretty basic.  I edit video in a different gamma than photographs (1.8 versus 2.2) so it is better to send Final Cut “flat” images and work the final result from within the video editing suite.

I thought the result was pretty cool and tells the story of the event in a unique and entertaining way.  I’ll likely alter my shooting slightly to enhance the results of future videos.  What I would normally consider gratuitous shots can now form the basis of short stop-action sequences.  Yet another tool in the story-telling kit.

—–

My thanks to Duke Levine for his permission to use his music in my blog videos.  If you like what you hear, visit Duke Levine’s MySpace page and pick up one of his albums.

Photos from the Harmony Halloween Horse Show can be found at: events.dmg-photography.com

REALLY getting it right in the camera…

This morning I was a contract shooter for a company that photographs triathlons. This was a big event – over 3,400 women athletes participating in the swim / bike / run race sponsored by Danskin (they’ve been doing this for 20 years now).

This also marks the first time I’ve shot JPEG in probably 8 years (and likely the first time my 1DMk2 has ever been in JPEG mode!) and possibly the most my flash has ever been used.  I shot over 1,700 photos in 4 hours (which is probably low compared to others on the photo team) and while it is embarrassing to say considering what the athletes were going through, it was pretty intense as a photographer and I think I sweated several pounds off today.  (I also have no idea how well I did because they keep all of the photos — a bit nerve-wracking.)

The challenge, for me, is one that photojournalists deal with all the time and my respect for their ability to pull that off on a daily basis could not be higher.  I normally shoot in RAW mode, which has numerous benefits but has one significant drawback: it demands a certain amount of post-processing (using a program like Lightroom or Aperture).   When you have 8 shooters and 3,400 subjects that equals a potential 10-20K images that need to be processed at the end of the event — so they are counting on the photographers to deliver “finished” images in the camera: exposure, composition, and white balance.

When one shoots RAW and expects to do some post-processing you can be a bit more cavalier about  some things.  White balance is one thing that I NEVER worry about in the field — that’s something I consider to be thought about and chosen later.  I’m usually pretty picky about the exposure, but composition kind of sits in the middle: there are times when I know I’m going to crop the photo later on so the composition in the camera isn’t as important.   (I also don’t think about whether or not the image fits nicely in an 8×10 frame.)

Interestingly, many of these disciplines of getting the white balance and other aspects of the image nailed down are still required for video.   Until we all get the equivalent of a RED camera (which is probably only a 2-4 years away) that shoots RAW video, it’s very costly to not get all aspects of the shot right in the camera.

With all that said, if you want to sharpen your action photography skills I can highly recommend trying to photograph a race (say a finish line or some other discrete event).  When the goal of having full-frame individual photos of each participant comes up against 8 athletes arriving more or less at the same time, you learn how to prioritize, frame, and shoot very quickly.  While your pulse may not be the same as someone finishing a half-mile swim, you’ll probably be burning some calories.   Add in that there’s no “RAW crutch” and there might even be a little sweat fogging up the eyepiece.

Anyway, my camera is safely back in RAW mode and after I clean off the beach sand and sweat stains it’ll be back to my comfortable shooting practice.  But it was certainly fun to have to perform “out of my element”, if only for a few hours.

And to the 3,000+ women who ran today’s Danskin triathlon: you are all amazing.

Pushing the limits

We had a mildly disappointing, but otherwise successful weekend in Loudon at the LRRS meet there on July 18-19.  Due to a number of scheduling conflicts over the coming months this might be my last trip there until next year.   It has been a very interesting learning experience and, above all, a good time with great folks (Chris Dinoia & Larry Graffam, Slowpoke Racing, were our hosts).

The disappointing aspect was that we, once again, failed to get inside the fence.  Despite all indications that we would get “press” access, when we actually tried to do it we were rebuffed.   I’m always a bit confused when folks do this for no apparent reason.  Here I am trying to help promote the races (and therefore the track) and they take a pass. Whatever.

If you want to see additional pictures from the weekend, head over to http://events.dmg-photography.com

So in my last blog article on the Loudon Road Racing meets I mentioned that I had hoped to find a way to get the viewer closer to the experience the riders (drivers?) were having. Helmet visors make this difficult a fair part of the time, but enough riders have clear visors to allow us to create a more personal connection with the experience.  Now, whether or not the riders want to see this type of photograph (and therefore make or destroy any chance of sales) remains to be seen.

Despite having very limited access to the track, I did find a few spots where, after taking some “safety shots”, I could push the limits of the camera (and me).  The lighting wasn’t close to ideal, but overall I was pretty happy with the results.  As a matter of fact, my success rate was so high that I clearly didn’t push hard enough.  Brooks Jensen (publisher of Lenswork) says the best way to approach your craft is to go too far and then come back a bit.  At the time I didn’t think I was playing it safe, but if and when I go back to Loudon I’ll likely give it a try.  I have to note that the challenge here is not “linear” – as the subject distance gets shorter the ability to frame and focus becomes extremely difficult very quickly (just look at the distance markers on your lens: small change from infinity to 50 meters, big change from 3 meters to 1).  So getting much tighter in on the bikes, which are moving along somewhere between 50 and 150 MPH, is going to take some practice.

With something other than harsh summer light, I think these would be pretty decent images.  The 500mm lens compresses the scene in a way that accentuates the adrenaline-pumping situation that is playing out before us.  While I certainly took my share of isolated bike shots, I went out of my way to try to find situations where the bikes were bunching up close or someone was trying to pass someone.  You can take exciting pictures of a running lion and another of a jumping gazelle — but put the two in the same image and a wholly different story unfolds.

With a couple of exceptions, the photos in this article were taken at “the bowl”, which is part of a series of sharp turns and elevation changes.  While some of the images in the larger gallery were shot through the chain-link fence and therefore firmly anchored on a tripod, these were taken handheld from a not terribly comfortable position (standing on a couple of barrels, hunched over, lens between the fence and the barbed wire).  To be fair, there’s no other way to get that particular angle at the bowl press-pass or no.  Whether or not better spots (with better light) await those who get the nod to travel inside the safety zone, that’s to be seen.

My exposure settings were all over the map depending on the light and circumstances.  Because the clouds were in and out all weekend and because I was primarily shooting handheld, I set the camera for shutter priority. For the fast closing shots 1/1600 to 1/2500 was typical with the aperture varying between f/6.3 and f/10 (this is when I wasn’t shooting through the fence…  otherwise I’m stuck at f/4-f/6.3).  As I said earlier, my keeper rate was surprisingly high with both the 1D Mark II and the 5D Mark II.  But I think I’ll try to remember to bring a little ladder along when I travel to Loudon.

So next time (perhaps next year) I’ll dust off these images and think about what I can do with the camera and my position to create more compelling images (more as in better, as opposed to additional quantity).  Thanks to all of the LRRS riders and the safety crews at New Hampshire Motor Speedway for an interesting new photographic challenge.  (And thanks to Jay and Betsy who took photos at the starting line on Saturday and Sunday, respectively).


Loudon Road Racing – The Eyes Have It

I’m starting to get the hang of shooting motorcycle racing — it’s a lot like sandhill cranes, only they’re moving a tiny bit faster.  Having sifted through a few thousand images of these skilled and only slightly insane competitors there is one thing that, for me, makes for a more compelling image: a clear helmet visor.

I’m sure there are lots of good reasons for tinted/mirrored visors but when I photograph a rider and I can see their eyes it utterly transforms the image from one of a technical portrait of a human/machine to a image that conveys the intensity and nerve it takes to do what they do – along with the connection between the driver and their bike.   I find a very similar situation when I photograph equestrian events and when the riders are competing over a certain level their facial expressions change from one of fear/tension/elation to concentration/planning/intensity and the resulting images are pretty powerful.

I’ll likely spend some additional time at the next race exploring this a bit more — trying to more powerfully convey what’s going on in that moment through the eyes of the driver.  Since they are whizzing by at 100mph, that should be a fairly decent challenge…

wpid842-20096-385-5049.jpg

The photos above were taken at the Loudon Road Racing Series (LRRS) “Classic” event on June 12th and 13th at the New Hampshire Motor Speedway in Loudon, NH.

Visit [url]http://events.dmg-photography.com[/url] for more photographs from my two days there.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
AJAXed with AWP