David Griffin Photography

Images, videos, tips and news from David Griffin Photography

Category Archives: Video

Click on the title of the blog post to view the entire entry.


Here we go again – another roaring river week

Another week, another 50-year rain storm…

I’m partly joking, I don’t know the recurrence level of this current storm but it’s nothing to sneeze at.

Here’s the flow gauge of the river for the past 30 days.  We’re in for another fun few days with the current forecast having the river rise potentially 2 feet above where it is right now, but they said the last storm would reach 7 feet as well, and it didn’t quite hit that mark.

On the other hand we’re starting from a significantly higher point.

All this water means that I’ll have a chance to visit a few more of the local streams and capture some, um, “rigorous” flow conditions.

These two events back to back have me hankering to build a time-lapse movie of the river’s rise.   Today it rose rather dramatically and did so during the daylight hours.  The only problem is that it was pouring rain and we had non-trivial winds as well.  I think I’m going to poke around and see if I can build a watertight box with a plexiglas viewport, perhaps lockable so I can chain it to a tree or something if needed.  This would let me set it up for a 12 hour run and try to bring this dynamic event to life.

As evening drew near I decided the 5D needed a bath, so I headed out into the backyard to take a few images.  I nearly froze my hands off in 15 minutes — the rain must be at 33 degrees (F). Here’s a bit of video from this evening:

[qt:/video/assabet-river-14mar2010.m4v 640 360]

Technical:

Images and video captured with a well-soaked Canon 5D Mark II, 16-35mm f/2.8L.  Image was at ISO 400, 1.6 seconds, f/5.6.  Video was at ISO 3200, 1/60, f/2.8.  Both were taken from Gitzo sticks and a Manfrotto fluid head.

Image processed with Lightroom, bit of fill and black point, moderate clarity.   Video was transcoded to ProRes LT by MPEG Streamclip, which was an unnecessary step because I then imported it into iMovie to trim, add the titles, and adjusted exposure +35%. Exported directly from iMovie to Quicktime H.264.

Exploring the Power of Water 1


Nature has given me a chance to do a bit of a personal workshop on the power of water.  In case you didn’t hear, we’ve had a bit of rain here in central Massachusetts the past few days (5 inches in 2 days and a bit more coming).

The Assabet River flows through my backyard and we live by the section which has the most intense rapids pretty much for the entire length of the river.  Normally the river is pretty tranquil, but it has been roaring the past 24 hours as it approaches what may be a crest that puts it in the top 10 for the past 50 years or so.

While I think I do a pretty decent job conveying the river’s beauty when it is quiet, I’ve struggled with finding the right combination of exposure and angle when it is flowing briskly.  Translating this:

[qt:/video/20102-263-4614.mp4 640 360]

into a still image that conveys that power and intensity is difficult.

I only had a couple hours today to work out back, but I’ll have a good chunk of the afternoon tomorrow and most of Sunday to do some exhaustive studies on the river when it is close to bursting at the seams.  I’ll be sharing the results here and hope they will be of interest to folks in a similar situation.   I’m also going to be playing with video as well.

Above:

Canon 5D Mark 2, ISO 100, 70-200mm f/2.8L at 200mm, polarizing filter.

First exposure is 2 seconds at f/14.  Second exposure is 15 seconds at f/14 (additional 3-stop ND filter).

Video: Canon 5D Mark 2 (exposure unrecorded).  No post-processing (other than resizing for blog).

Processed with Lightroom: strong contrast, fair amount of clarity and vibrance.  Creative tweak: fill light and black point both around 45.  A rather cool effect.

Camera movements with a portable slider

wpid1600-20101-491-1066.jpg As a one-person production company I’m continually striving to create a look that rivals what normally is accomplished by teams of people.  Today’s technology, such as smaller cameras with low-light capabilities, allows individuals (or very small teams) to do the job that in the past required entire film crews.  (See Shane Hurlbut’s article on his team shooting on the high seas from a U.S. Navy sub for someone practicing this at a level I can only dream of.)

Many years ago we purchased our first set of kayaks.  No moving parts, just a watertight shell.   But after that purchase came the realization that “you’re gonna need accessories”…  Paddles, PFDs, dry bags, gloves.  It took several years before we could walk into an REI without avoiding a stroll through the paddling section.

Photography is no different.  The camera purchase itself is, quite often, the tip of the iceberg.  (For many years I’d tell folks that I had spent far more on lenses than camera bodies, although that balance is beginning to erode as my lens set is stable now but there’s a slow but steady march to upgrade the camera bodies.)    Camera accessories can go in a number of directions: lighting, stabilization, filters, remote controls, etc.  Add video to the mix and you have more lighting, microphones, matte boxes, monitors, and a wide range of stabilization options.  There are thick catalogs full of wonderful ideas waiting to empty your bank account.

I recently decided that to be competitive in video production I would need the ability to have some additional  ”camera moves” (providing movement within the frame) beyond the tilts and pans my fluid head could provide.  Professional rigging equipment costs a lot of money.  This isn’t a complaint: manufacturing equipment that performs at a high level of precision and is rugged costs money, but I have a limited equipment budget so I looked into some DIY portable dolly systems.   One that popped out at me is affectionately known as the “Zazaslider” (after the creator who posted the instructions for building it in the DVXuser forum). I’m not what you would call particularly skilled at building things, but this looked within my abilities so I gave it a try.   I won’t go into the construction details, those are outlined very well elsewhere, but I thought it would be fun to show my modifications, my plans, and a bit about how it is used.  First the rig:

wpid1594-20101-491-1063.jpg

Here’s the slider with my current camera mount, a Manfrotto HDV701 fluid head. My slider weighs in at 6.4 lbs, and the HDV701 head (with a Arca-Swiss quick release plate on the Bogen quick release plate) is 2.4 lbs – so I’m expecting it to stay under 9 lbs even with anticipated additions.

wpid1596-20101-491-1064.jpg

This is the bare slider.  The metal part is the primary piece, purchased from IGUS (just over the border in Rhode Island).  The DryLin W rail is 1 meter long and features a lubrication-free guide that provides a smooth and low-friction platform.

wpid1598-20101-491-1065.jpg

I had to drill and tap a 3/8″ hole for the mounting bolt.

wpid1602-20101-491-1067.jpg

The rail comes with predrilled holes, so I could put a 3/8″ tap in the center one for a mount point.

wpid1604-20101-491-1068.jpg

The rail needs a few basic tweaks to be useful.  The first is some nylon bushings tapped into the end that keeps the carriage from running off the rails.  That would be an expensive problem with a camera attached.  I added a couple of lightweight feet that are easily removed if needed (I need to give them a coat of paint).  I recently added a nylon screw to one end to help secure the carriage during transport.

wpid1606-20101-491-1069.jpg

My original foot was just a block, but after my first trip into the field with the slider I realized that if you want to perch this on top of a log, you need something that isn’t flat along the base, so a quick trip to the bandsaw was in order.

wpid1612-20101-491-1072.jpg

I tapped a 3/8″ hole so that my Gitzo G1321 leveling base can “simply” screw into the rail.  This works OK but makes setup a bit slow.  I plan to put a sturdy quick Arca Swiss or Bogen release plate there so I can more easily attach it to a tripod head.

wpid1614-20101-491-1073.jpg

And finally the full rig attached to my tripod.  The leveling base makes for quick work in setting up the slider.  While this configuration is fairly stable, it still requires additional support when extending the camera the full 1 meter length.

There are two basic moves you can do with the slider: dolly zoom (forward/backwards) or dolly sideways (truck/tracking shot).  Here is an example of a dolly zoom:

[qt:/video/20101-zoom-slide.mov 640 360]

And here are two examples of a tracking shots (one on the tripod and one with just the slider):

[qt:/video/20101-dolly-slide.mov 640 360]

[qt:/video/20101-floor-slide.mov 640 360]

The slider requires quite a bit of practice to use effectively.  I’ve also noted that the rail system’s tolerances are very close so if condensation builds up on the aluminum rails (say, by bringing it indoors when it is cold outside) it can bind up a bit.  I’ve used it in the rain and noted similar performance anomalies.  (A dolly rig based on roller wheels likely doesn’t have this issue.)

I’ve used this for commercial shoots and nature videos.  It is quite portable and definitely gets the job done for a very reasonable outlay (so far it has cost less than $200 for the parts and tools).

As I noted earlier I plan to add a quick release plate to make setup and teardown a bit easier.  I may add a second setscrew towards the center as it is awkward to set up with the carriage at one end (or add a brake to the carriage).

I’m also interested in finding a variable speed stepping motor so I can use the rail system to provide movement in time-lapse photographic projects.  I’ll be sure write about that when those pieces come together.   (First I have to add a follow-focus unit.)

I hope you found this tour of the slider useful.  You can find the same Igus technology used in some commercial sliders, so while this is a pretty simple DIY project it shares the strengths of a number of rigs costing a lot more.

wpid1616-20101-491-1076.jpg

Four New Year’s Visual Treats

20085-491-7342

The first few days of January have brought us some wonderful video feasts of natural wonder, technical skill, and imagination.

The first comes from Tony Farley.  I’ve recommended Tony’s “Beautiful Places in HD” podcast in the past and he kicked off 2010 with a visit to Methuselah Grove – a beautifully barren landscape that holds the oldest living trees on the planet.  I highly recommend subscribing to Tony’s podcast on iTunes or your favorite subscription service.

Click here to visit Methuselah Grove with Tony Farley.

Tony Farley’s blog is also a great place to get news on his projects.

On the same day Tony’s video arrived on my Apple TV, so did the first 2010 episode from the Earth-Touch crew.   Earth-Touch is another HD podcast that provides absolutely some of the best wildlife videography around on a nearly continuous basis (they have a weekly podcast and other feeds that have more extended footage).  The first show was the highlights of 2009, including some amazing (and, I should warn you, graphic) footage of a pride of lions taking down a bull water buffalo.

storythumb

Earth-Touch provides numerous ways of subscribing to their video feeds and I encourage you to find one that suits your needs.  You will not be disappointed.

Jewel #3 is a stunning and viral video by Alex Roman.

[vimeo]http://vimeo.com/7809605[/vimeo]

Alex’s vision is wonderfully realized and it is also an amazing technical achievement for a single person — the entire film is computer-generated imagery.  Just stunning.

The final New Year’s jewel arrived on PBS this evening.  The Jan 10th episode of Nature titled “Hummingbirds: Magic in the Air” was filmed using Phantom HD cameras and a number of special optics.  The Phantom is capable of shooting at very high frame rates and filmed the hummingbirds at 500 fps — doing what photography does best: making the unseen seen.  In this case, it allows us to see the acrobatics and grace of a bird that normally flits by in the blink of an eye.

If you miss it on your local PBS station, you can watch the full episode on the PBS web site.

I hope one of these amazing video projects peaks your interest.  Happy New Year!

A Rainy Autumn Afternoon at Danforth Brook

[vimeo]http://vimeo.com/8400161[/vimeo]

Hidden in a corner of Hudson, MA is Danforth Brook, a tributary of the Assabet River.  A short walk from the road, the brook changes from a meandering stream in the woods to a series of small waterfalls working their way through large glacial boulders.  I rarely visit this spot without returning with some great photographs.

Technical

Filmed with a Canon 5D Mark 2, 70-200mm f/2.8L and 24-70 f/2.8L lenses.  (And changing them in the rain is no fun at all…)

Camera moves were done with a home-made portable track  (similar to the Glidetrack).  I plan to write an article about this as I get more experience with it.

A big shout-out to danosongs for providing soundtrack music for these tiny projects for free.

Editing Canon 5D Mark 2 footage – tools and timings

2009-transcode-comp

The Canon 5D Mark 2 (and the 7D and a fair number of current video-capable DSLRs) record the footage using the H.264 codec.  I’ll leave it to others far more qualified than I as to the merits and lack thereof of this decision by the manufacturers.  For owners of the cameras wishing to use them for video it means you have some work to do after you shoot.

H.264 is often referred to as “distribution codec” — in other words it is optimized for end display rather than other purposes.  Of interest to the photographer this translates to “it is really lousy for editing”.

Because of the preponderance of its use in DSLR (and other) cameras I’ll predict that future editing suites will start to ingest H.264 footage directly, perhaps converting it quietly to some intermediate format — but until that time you’ll want to do this yourself before you edit your clips.

For about the past year, when I have a set of 5D clips for editing I’ve been transcoding them to Apple ProRes.  This is a high quality codec that works well with the editing tools.  It also eats up disk space like they have shares in Seagate.  I’ve heard of some folks using the XDCAM codec with a fair degree of success.  I’ve heard plenty of other people say “disk space is cheap” (which it is), but it isn’t free and it adds up quickly.

On Macintosh there are two tools that I have tried and used and I thought I’d share a few bits about them.  I edit using Apple’s Final Cut Pro Studio, which includes a transcoding swiss army knife called “Compressor”.    If you don’t have the budget for FCP Studio (and, as you will see, even if you do) you should look at “MPEG Streamclip” which has a number of great features including the ever popular price tag of free.  There are numerous excellent tutorials on each of these tools — just google around.

I’ve been using Compressor to transcode my 5D footage to Apple ProRes 422 pretty regularly because it has a really cool feature: droplets.  You can create droplets that correspond to specific Compressor settings and destinations, then either drag the input files to the droplet (or control-click to open the file(s) with the droplet.  As Emeril says.. “Bam!”

With the most recent release of Final Cut Studio (FCP 7) Apple introduced some additions to the ProRes codecs.  Originally there were two variations, the normal or standard quality (at 147 Mbps) and the high quality codec (at 220 Mbps).  For most of us this roughly translates into taking a lot of disk space and taking up an enormous amount of disk space.  Unless you are producing a high-end film with lots of compositing (or have specific technical issues with the footage around grading) the HQ version was overkill.  For most of us, producing videos for the web or DVD, even the standard quality ProRes was over the top.  Enter ProRes 422 LT and ProRes 422 Proxy.  The LT codec tries to find a balance between quality and space at 102 Mbps while the ProRes Proxy dives down to 45Mbps and is suited for editing on laptops.  (Note that even at 45Mbps that’s 9X what Vimeo and YouTube HD are accepting videos at.)

I have yet to play with the Proxy codec extensively, but the LT codec looked very appealing and I wanted to explore some issues I had with the MPEG Streamclip program so I ran a few tests.   MPEG Streamclip has the reputation of being very fast – and in a few tests I was running I never saw this.  The devil being in the details of course.   I also noted a gamma shift in MPEG Streamclip footage which bothered me.  Again, it was worth looking at a bit closer.

First the “gamma shift” problem.  Here is the output of the same video clip transcoded by Compressor (on the left) and MPEG Streamclip (on the right) as displayed by Quicktime Player:

gamma-diff

It’s pretty obvious that the MPEG Streamclip footage is darker.  Apparently this is caused by a small difference in the Quicktime file metadata.  Compressor adds a “gamma” tag that MPEG Streamclip does not.  The result is that Quicktime Player displays them differently.   Here’s the fun part: Final Cut Pro doesn’t look at this gamma tag, or does it differently.  The result is that the footage looks the same.  Here is a short Quicktime video of the same clip alternating between Compressor and MPEG Streamclip:

[qt:/video/2009-transcode-comp.mov 640 360]

Maybe a more well-trained eye can spot a difference, but I can’t.  So when it comes to editing it appears to me that the resulting clips are equivalent.  Whew!

With quality out of the way, that leaves just space and time to consider.  I processed 16 5DMk2 H.264 clips totaling 7 minutes of footage and consuming 2GB of disk space.

Depending on the project I often try to save disk space by converting the footage from the native 1080p to 720p (times are min:sec):

To ProRes 422 LT 720p via Compressor: 12:44 and 2.3GB
To ProRes 422 LT 720p via MPEG Streamclip: 14:52 and 2.3GB

To ProRes 422 LT 1080p via Compressor: 17:17 and 4.5GB (2.2X original)
To ProRes 422 LT 1080p via MPEG Streamclip: 10:54 and 4.5GB

Kinda eye-popping counterintuitive results there.  If you want to save disk space by downsampling to 720p, use Compressor.  If you want fast conversions the use MPEG Streamclip with no resizing.

For disk space comparisons, the standard quality ProRes 422 at 1080p would take 6.9GB (3.5X original files, MPEG Streamclip transcoded them in 11:46) .

My test configuration was pretty mundane and this was not an attempt to get the best performance out of either tool, but rather to see how they performed “out of the box”.   Source and destination files were to the same drive (as you would on a laptop). Compressor has ways of using multiple systems to distribute the encoding and improve the performance.  MPEG Streamclip has the ability to run multiple transcodes at once.  If you have a lot of fast CPUs in your system, this can certainly help.  I have a quad-processor MacPro and neither program would drive the system to full CPU capacity.  By adding increasing the MPEG Streamclip to 2 simultaneous tasks I was able to trim some time off the transcoding and saw the system CPU utilization approach 80%.  Adding a 3rd task didn’t do anything to increase utilization.  Those of you with 8-CPU boxes would likely see a benefit from using these features to take advantage of parallelism in your system.

I mentioned ProRes 422 Proxy and I think I will dig into this a bit more.  It has a data rate of 45Mbps.  The Canon 5D Mark 2 with the current firmware clocks in around 38Mbps – but I don’t know if this is an apples to apples comparison.  MPEG Streamclip transcoded the test files to ProRes Proxy at 720p in about 14 minutes and the resulting files were just 1.1GB (half of the original) and the full 1080p transcode took about 10 minutes and the resulting files were 2.2GB (slightly larger than the originals).  I, quite honestly, didn’t see much of a difference between the full ProRes standard quality and the Proxy transcoded files with the 5D footage, so this deserves a bit more investigation to understand exactly what kinds of scenes are being compromised.  If the typical delivery is going to be 720p web video (or an SD DVD) and you are doing minimal grading and editing, using the ProRes Proxy format may turn out to be a perfect editing format and you can always reconnect to higher quality versions (standard or LT) if you need them.  Certainly something worth investigating further.

Signs of Autumn

Autumn’s is beginning to make itself known here in Massachusetts.   A little preview of the show yet to come.

[vimeo]http://vimeo.com/6843830[/vimeo]

Technical stuff:

Image: Canon 5D Mark 2, 70-200mm f/2.8 L + 1.4x TC, 240mm, 1/60 at f/5.0, ISO 200.  Minor post-processing in Lightroom (exposure, black point, some vibrance, clarity).

Video: Canon 5D Mark 2, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L, 500mm f/4.0L, various ISOs, and f-stops.  Edited with Final Cut Pro.  Minor grading via FCP color correction tool.  The Vimeo compression seems to have taken some of the oomph out of the colors.   I may publish my own version here.

The music score is from Garageband (my arrangement).  Apologies for the frog — I couldn’t help myself.

Waning Days of Summer on Lake Boon

I had to get out of the house and do a little bit of photography.  I have a tiny project for our local state representative that I’ve had on the books for a while, waiting for the scenery to perk up.  So I headed out to Stow and did some shooting.  I ended up at Lake Boon and what unfolded over the next hour had “end of summer” written all over it.  It was a warm autumn evening and folks were still enjoying the lake as the sun creeped slowly to the horizon.

One of the great benefits of the new breed of DSLRs is the ability to shoot video and I took the opportunity to capture some of the quiet scenes that came by that evening.  I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.  (Click the HD button for better quality if you’ve got fast internets.)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es1YUOFg1V8[/youtube]

The Hoodman HoodLoupe

One of the dirty little secrets of photography is that it isn’t the camera that gets your wallet – it’s the accessories that are so adept at performing cashectomies.

Six months ago I wrote a short article on the Canon 5D Mark 2 and why I decided to purchase one.  Since then it has steadily become my primary camera for all but high-speed action shots (for that my Canon 1D Mark 2 stays at the top of the roost in my shop).   I now regularly switch the plate on my Libec H38 video head from the XH-A1 to a Really Right Stuff quick release clamp (it still is a hack and I’m hoping someone will come up with something better — I wrote to RRS but, so far, no response.)

When Philip Bloom wrote about the Zacuto viewfinder that worked with the 5D I immediately had accessory lust.  Unfortunately the Zacuto viewfinders sold out very quickly and I figured I’d have to wait a few months for its replacement (although the sticker shock of the viewfinder meant that I had some time to save up my pennies…)

I then stumbled on the Hoodman HoodLoupe 3.0 and, given the unknowns about the Zacuto’s V2 viewfinder delivery time and price, that the HoodLoupe would be worth the price and I could set myself up for a little New Year’s gift for myself a few months down the road.

While the order was being shipped, Philip Bloom got a hold of a Hoodman HoodLoupe and wrote a great review of it as a viewfinder for the 5DMk2 and I highly advise reading his article if you are interested in purchasing it.

I had some reservations about the Hoodman Loupe, particularly because I wear eyeglasses, but overall the reviews of it that I did find were generally positive and Philip’s review reinforced my expectations and reservations.

The first thing to note is that the HoodLoupe retails for about $80.  But that just gives you a loupe that is designed to be used to inspect still images or the Live Preview screen whilst on a tripod.  I have to say that it is worth the money alone for that feature and having used it now for a few days under sunny conditions, if I ever replace it with the Zacuto finder or equivalent, it’ll still be in my bag for this purpose.  It works great.

But to use it as a video viewfinder you have to make it “stick” to your camera.  Hoodman kindly provides a “Cinema Mount Strap” for $25.  I looked at this add-on and said to myself “$25 is a lot to pay for a piece of elastic cord”.  I checked with my wife, who happens to be a seamstress, and she was pretty sure she had some cord down in her shop.   $80 it was – the cinema mount would be a DIY project.

I took a length of elastic cord, used a twist tie to create an attachment loop opposite the one Hoodman so kindly provided for its strap, and added a little clamping gizmo to cinch it up.   Now the topologists out there will correctly note that this makes it pretty much impossible to detach without rethreading the clamping gizmo because the elastic goes over the front of the camera and you can’t get past the camera straps.  2 points for thinking ahead.  Fortunately my accessory lust paid benefits this time — my camera strap is an Op/Tech which just so happens to have clips on it to allow me to remove it.  I love it when a plan comes together. :-)


So with just a bit of hackery I have a workable viewfinder for the 5D that allows me to comfortably shoot video both on a tripod and handheld.

From a comfort point of view it is acceptable — no worse than the regular eyepiece.   If I had to spend hours every day shooting through it I can see where it would wear out its welcome.

The viewscreen is clear and bright.  Because I wear eyeglasses I’m sure I’m stretching the “eye relief” of the optics and there is some distortion around the very edges – but that area normally never contains image.  As I have particularly bad eyesight, I’m pretty much used to these types of tradeoffs.

I’ve found that once I start working with it, Live View becomes much more accessible even when doing stills.  I was lining up some macro shots and use the 5x magnification to pinpoint the focus.  This is SO much better with the HoodLoupe than without — particularly in daylight.  Switching modes and settings while staying on the viewfinder became very natural and easy.

I’ve done a little bit of handheld video shooting (of the grandson of course) and I’m pretty happy with the results.  The combination of the HoodLoupe on the back and a 50mm f/1.4 on the front is a powerful video image-making tool.  I even shot some handheld 500mm f/4 footage (with image stabilization on) and I’m excited about trying some video of the Osprey from the kayak (it’ll never be feature-worthy, but it might be good enough as a video clip or two in a presentation).

The camera itself continues to fit perfectly into a number of workflows.   I used it for the first time as my B-roll camera for a business profile video I shot at a Boston hotel.  The ability to mount my 16-35mm lens on it and get beautiful wide-angle shots of the guest suites and lobby made for a far better end product.

Now armed with a workable viewfinder I’ll likely be expanding my use of the camera…. which will lead me to the next accessory: a dedicated video head clamp that can rotate 90 degrees to accommodate the camera and/or telephoto lenses! Are you listening Really Right Stuff?

Three Stone Mountain LIVE videos

Three, no, four* videos from the June 6, 2009 Stone Mountain LIVE performance:

“Leavin’ On Your Mind” – Carol and the Stone Mountain Boys
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxDVDuriHiA[/youtube]

“Ten Year Night” – Lucy Kaplansky
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8q48kD9Blo[/youtube]

“Born To Be With You” – Blackstone Valley Bluegrass
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPdIy89BWRY[/youtube]

“I Dream of Jeannie” theme song – The Stone Mountain Boys having a bit of fun with the Lowrey organ
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_BNG7EkEGI[/youtube]

Technical: Filmed with a Canon 5D Mark 2, 70-200mm f/2.8L lens, on a Libec H38 video head. Manual exposure: ISO 2000, 1/30s, f3.5, 3200K. This was my first major video project with the manual exposure capability in the 5D firmware and it was a joy to use!

5D footage was converted from H.264 to ProRes 422, edited and graded with Final Cut Pro, then exported via Compressor to H.264, 720p, 5MB/s for YouTube HD (actually the “Leavin’ On Your Mind” was accidently exported below 720p, so only shows up as high quality, not HD).

* Updated on 25-Jun to include the Lucy Kaplansky video. Many thanks to Lucy for giving us permission to make it publicly accessible.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
AJAXed with AWP